On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 20:44 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On 01/05/2008 Robert Scheck wrote:
> looks like a normal free license to me.
It looks that way to me, but the wording is unique in a few parts, and
I'm not sure it if is GPL compatible or not.
If I had to guess, I would say Free and GPLv2/v3 Compatible, but I'd
rather let the FSF pass judgement. :)
This one came back as non-free. I spoke to the author of the license,
and he's moved the code that used it to Apache 2.0: