[Fedora-legal-list] Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR?
It hasn't changed. I don't know where Miro was going with his comment.
On 20 November 2017 at 08:14, Jared K. Smith <jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Miro Hrončok
<mhroncok(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I also forgot we are talking about Copr here, which doesn't have to comply
> with all the Fedora packaging guidelines.
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that
packages in COPR still have to comply with the Fedora packaging requirements
which pertain to copyright/trademark/patent/trade secrets. Or has that
changed and I didn't notice?!?
--
Jared Smith
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Stephen J Smoogen.