Hi,

I'm currently in the process of updating the package anki to a new major release for which I need guidance regarding the mix of licensing.

Originally I was setting the bug report for the new release ([1]) to block FE-Legal in order to get confirmation that my findings regarding the licenses are OK and acceptable for Fedora. Since I haven't received any feedback for a while, that was probably not the best way to reach the FE-Legal team and so I'll repeat my question here:

---------------------------------------------------------------
The new major version of anki 2.1.x includes some new files with new licenses. Upstream has updated the LICENSE file(s) accordingly.

IMHO this would result in the following License tag in the spec file:

License:        AGPLv3+ and GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ and MIT and BSD and ASL 2.0 and CC-BY-SA and CC-BY

Please can FE-Legal confirm, that this combination of licenses is OK?


As reference, here are the relevant snippets of the two license files:

1. LICENSE
[...]
The following included source code items use a license other than AGPL3:

 * Anki's translations: BSD.
 * Qt's bundled translations: LGPL3.
 * The anki/template/ folder is based off pystache: MIT.
 * The SuperMemo importer: GPL3.
 * The Pauker importer: BSD-3.
 * mpv.py: MIT.
 * statsbg.py: CC BY-SA 3.0.
 * winpaths.py: MIT.
 * MathJax: Apache 2.
 * jQuery and jQuery-UI: MIT.
 * browsersel.js: CC BY 2.5.
 * plot.js: MIT.

[...]

2. LICENSE.logo:
[...]
Anki's logo is copyright Alex Fraser, and is licensed under the AGPL3 like the
[...]

The official source of the tarball which includes the complete license files can be found here: https://apps.ankiweb.net/downloads/current/anki-2.1.12-source.tgz
---------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you very much in advance!

Best regards,
Christian

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612847