I have not looked at the final draft, but as I understand it the purpose of issuing eupl 1.1 was to make it osi compliant. So it *should* be good now.


On May 29, 2009 9:35 AM, "Caolán McNamara" <caolanm@redhat.com> wrote:

On this list previously the EUPL v1.0 was considered unacceptable for

Since then, there is now a EUPL v1.1, http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/eupl
does that fix the problems, or remain unacceptable ?

Assuming that the EUPL v1.1 remains unacceptable, can someone e.g. dual
licence something as EUPL v1.X and say LGPLv2 in order to make it
acceptable for us.


Fedora-legal-list mailing list