On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:58:09AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> discussing with the Red Hat legal team. If not, I'm not sure
this is
> really a legal issue (other than in the sense of refining what
> 'Fedora' means).
AIUI this was about being able to use the *primary* marks in a
controlled way, but Matthew can correct me if I'm wrong.
I freely admit to being unclear on the exact legal meaning there.
"Fedora Remix" is the current secondary mark, and also clearly includes
the primary "Fedora" trademark.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader