On 04/29/2009 01:19 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
The copyright holder didn't permit the combination of the second
of code (which, being driver code rather than firmware, is software even
under your standards) with the other “derived from proprietary
unpublished source code”
Given that the copyright holder on BOTH works is the same, unless you
have it in writing from the copyright holder that they do not permit
this combination, I don't draw the same conclusion as you.