On Wednesday 16 of March 2016 09:17:49 Richard Fontana wrote:
> The other thing is that it does not seem to be the right place
> sources from OSGi, but rather like some build-product sources (side effect
> of maven build?), but I'm not sure. So trying to find authoritative
> sources leads to , but that forces me to "Accept":
> "OSGi Specification License, Version 2.0."
>  Marek posted this before:
So do you know if the authoritative sources are actually obtainable if
you do accept, or have you not checked because you don't feel
I haven't accepted mostly because OSGi Specification License is not "Good"
based on , without much thinking about it - but yes, it is not
comfortable and sounds like unnecessary in FOSS. So I do not know whether
the sources are there at all.