On 01/31/2011 11:23 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
hey say that
the copyright holder's actions never "violate" the GPL, at least with
respect to distribution and modification. This would appear consistent
with my interpretation that the distribution and modification terms are
conditions of the copyright license offered to licensees, and not
licensor commitments.
Except that it is logically invalid. If the copyright holder is not
promising via the GPL to provide the source to those who are using the
Program under the terms, how are those parties expected to pass the
source along to anyone else?
~tom
==
Fedora Project