On 5/11/22 4:44 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 10. 05. 22 v 16:56 Jilayne Lovejoy napsal(a):
>
>
> On 5/10/22 1:56 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>> Dne 10. 05. 22 v 9:06 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
>>> I took the initiative and drafted
>>>
>>>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1
>>
>>
>> Nice! Thx.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I did **not** set it as ready for wrangler yet. I welcome comments.
>>> And feel free to edit it directly. Especially these who I put there
>>> as proposal owners.
> at the risk of sounding naive or clueless - what does "ready for
> wrangler" mean?
>>>
>>> I would love to track all remaining work in the Scope section, so
>>> we know what needs to be done and who is responsible. I am sure I
>>> missed something there. Feel free to add it.
>>
>>
>> I am honestly not sure about:
>>
>> > There will be Phase 2, where we identify the remaining packages
>> and help them to migrate to the SPDX formula.
>>
>>
>> 1) I think it will be risky to do this via automation.
> only some of the ids could be done via automation in any case. many
> will need a closer inspection
>>
>> 2) I don't think we will ever have the man power to do this.
> I agree that some additional help or tooling process or hackfest or
> ... ??? would be good. need more brainstorming on this.
>>
>> 3) I don't think this should happen any time soon.
> but we also don't want a period of using a mix of Fedora ids and SPDX
> ids in Fedora to linger on for a long time as that would sort of
> defeat the purpose of making the change. hence some planning around 1
> and 2 would help perhaps
Well, yes, that is good point. Still not sure.
Actually, @Mirek shouldn't the Phase 2 be "SPDX is mandatory for new
packages from certain point in time" instead followed by Phase 3 with
complete migration to SPDX?
I was thinking that Phase 1 (the point at which SPDX ids are officially
adopted and the various tasks noted in the Change proposal) would mean:
SPDX ids are mandatory for new packages as of DATE.
Phase 2 would then be all about how to most efficiently get existing
package spec files updated - which will be a longer phase.
Jilayne
Vít
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure