On 02/07/2011 04:06 PM, Richard Fontana wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:12PM -0500, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 02/07/2011 03:52 PM, Richard Fontana wrote:
>> Maybe it's only
>> practical for Fedora to label this as "GPLv2 or GPLv3", and if in the
>> distant future the KDE organization also approved GPLv4 the license
>> tag could just be updated accordingly (much like any special license
>> change might be treated). Look to spot for the official answer though.
>
> I think this is sensible. Handle it like this:
>
> # KDE e.V. may determine that future GPL versions are accepted
> License: GPLv2 and GPLv3
Shouldn't it be "GPLv2 or GPLv3"? It's like a (disjunctive) dual
license.
Yes, you're right. It is a Monday.
# KDE e.V. may determine that future GPL versions are accepted
License: GPLv2 or GPLv3
~tom
==
Fedora Project