[Fedora-legal-list] Could someone review erlang-sext?
Hello All.
There was a concern regarding legal status of a couple of source files
which are distributed w/o explicit licensing term. I rewrote them
completely while maintaining the original API and licensed the
resulting work under MIT.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652648
Could someone please make a legal review of the current situation? If
MIT isn't ok then I can relicense it under a different license -
that's not an issue.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.