On 11/11/2013 10:35 AM, Miro HronĨok wrote:
> We really didn't want to have to review all the non-free
licenses out
> there to determine whether they were freely distributable without
> restriction, especially since we know that the majority of these
> licenses are not.
I believed that one can use Copr to build and distribute they own
non-free software.
While I'm not overly excited about this prospect, if this is something
that the Fedora community really wants to do, we can start reviewing
non-free items for distributability. I suspect most people will be
disappointed at how few non-free licenses permit the level of
distributability necessary to be in a Copr.
~tom
==
Fedora Project