On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 3:40 PM Jason Yundt <swagfortress(a)gmail.com> wrote:
In the FCPA, The definition for “Moral Rights Clause Waiver” references “Section 4d of
CC-BY-SA”, but that subsection doesn’t exist.
Also, the Other FAQs’s first two questions still refer to CC BY-SA 3.0 even though the
FCPA has been updated to use CC BY-SA 4.0.
Indeed, this should have been caught when the FPCA was updated to
reference CC BY-SA 4.0 as the default content license. The relevant
perceived problematic feature of CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported was fixed in CC
I don't know if it is better to fix this error or to instead look into
eliminating the FPCA requirement. The FPCA is now basically outdated
and has the detriment of being pointed to by certain CLA advocates as
proof that "Red Hat supports CLAs".