On 1/14/22 2:02 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 14. 01. 22 v 0:00 Jilayne Lovejoy napsal(a):
To put it another way, I can't think of any real-world disjunctive dual license involving a (likely) "bad" license other than the Perl module case (where of course it is really common). If it's so unusual, why should the guidelines address it at all? Or if the only likely example is the Perl one, then the guidelines should only use the Perl (GPL/Artistic) example.
well, as Miroslav began this thread asking about the scenario of having a Good or Bad license (and didn't seem to indicate it was specifically the Perl example - I assumed Fedora packagers are coming across such scenarios
Nope. From me this was completely theoretical question. Just to make the algorithm complete.
The full scan of all spec does not found any such case.
ha! well, lesson learned - I should have not assumed and began with this question...
Miroslav
legal mailing list --legal@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email tolegal-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure