[Fedora-legal-list] Re: Is the coremark-pro Acceptable Use Agreement acceptable?

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:47:16AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 3:09 PM Michel Salim  wrote:
> > Most of it seems like standard trademark protection boilerplate, but
> > this section in particular seems concerning:
>
> If it said "you can't put our marks on the output without a license",
> I think that would be fine. But since it forbids any use of the output
> without a license, it's not acceptable for inclusion in Fedora repos.

Ah, I was afraid that might be the case. If I were to add it to... one
of the third party repos, it would be in the non-free section,
presumably

Thanks,