On 02/27/2018 03:03 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
As of 2001, CP/M, originally from Digital Research, was released
under a
license that has been reported as open source:
http://www.cpm.z80.de/license.html
On the one hand, I'm concerned with the phrase "as part of the
'Unofficial CP/M Web Site", but on the other hand, that is immediately
followed by "with its maintainers, developers and community", which
seems broadly inclusive.
Is this license satisfactory for Fedora?
My reading is that this is a permissive open source license. I would
argue that Fedora, in the act of distributing the CP/M technology found
on the 'Unofficial CP/M Web Site', is part of the community (as well as
anyone downstream of Fedora).
That said, the wording is weird, so I'm deferring to Richard.
~tom