On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 21:31 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
SciLab has changed its licence to CeCILLv2, which claims to be GPLv2+
compatible. I tried reading it and it gave me a headache. It seems
to contain a few dubious passages. Could RH Legal have a look at it
and decide if it's OK to include code licensed under it in Fedora?
Yep, they're all fine, they were in the Licensing list already:
CeCILL License v2 is Free and GPL compatible. (License: CeCILL)
CeCILL-B License is Free but GPL-incompatible (License: CeCILL-B)
CeCILL-C License is Free but GPL-incompatible (License: CeCILL-C)
I'll worry about v1 if something actually uses it.