[Fedora-legal-list] Re: Volatility Software License

[Miro Hrončok]

On 03. 03. 20 20:16, Tom Callaway wrote:
> Short answer: No.
>
> Long answer: This license is too broad and attempts to extend the scope of the 
> license beyond the software and derived works and into things like training 
> materials. Additionally, there is an irony in that this license does not attempt 
> to impose itself on incoming contributions, but rather, uses BSD 2-Clause Plus 
> Patent License. It begs the question of why upstream does not simply use that 
> license (which is Free and acceptable for Fedora).

Ack, I've closed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767234