>>>> "NP" == Nils Philippsen
<nils(a)redhat.com> writes:
NP> Legal question: is it better to put this in its own subpackage to be
NP> able to specify this individual license, or would GIMP better have
NP> "GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ and (GPLv2 or GPLv3)" as its license?
This is covered by
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Lice...
Basically, you are encouraged to separate differently licensed pieces of
code into subpackages with different licensing. However, it is
sufficient to simply indicate all of the licenses in the License: tag
and include an explanation of which files in the binary package are
under which license. (Various methods for doing this are given in the
URL above.)
- J<