[Fedora-legal-list] Does Bodhi need to be covered by the FPCA?

[Randy Barlow]

For a long time I didn't know that Bodhi should be covered by the FPCA
so some commits have gone in from contributors who don't have Fedora
accounts. Pierre-Yves Chibon had mentioned to me that it was required
for contributors to sign the FPCA, but then I forgot to check that for
a long time until today, resulting in even more contributions that
weren't covered by the FPCA.

I read the FPCA again today and noticed that it defines "Submit" with
examples that end with "version control systems administered by
Fedora". Though the examples do say "without limitation", the fact that
it doesn't just say "version control systems" seems to imply that
version control systems not administered by Fedora would not be
covered. Since Bodhi is on GitHub which is not administered by Fedora,
does Bodhi need FPCA for contributions? Is License In = License Out not
sufficient for Bodhi?

If it is required, what should I do about the contributors from the
past who hadn't agreed to the FPCA?

I wrote this pull request for the case that FPCA is required:

https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/1388