[Fedora-legal-list] rubygem GPLv3 package requiring GPLv2 package
Hi,
I'm working on packaging rubygem-ditz which is licensed under GPLv3
( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 ). Ditz require
library rubygem-trollop which is under GPLv2
( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 ). My question is
if this is ok for fedora and FE-LEGAL block could be removed from bug
525211 or if upstream will need to change licensing or what should be
done. I think that this is the case which is mentioned in Licensing FAQ
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#What_about_interpreted_langu...)
Any idea?
Thanks,
Best Regards,
Jan Klepek