[Fedora-legal-list] Allow to delete builds/coprs from playground? (was: Re: Meeting minute from Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-04-15))

[Honza Horak]

On 04/15/2014 04:22 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>  ============================================
>  #fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-04-15)
>  ============================================
>
>
>  Meeting started by mmaslano at 12:01:12 UTC. The full logs are available
>  at
>
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-04-15/env-and-stacks...
>
>  .
>
>
>
>  Meeting summary
>  ---------------
>  * init process  (mmaslano, 12:01:30)
>     * LINK:
>
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Workstation_Enable_Software_Collec...
>
>       (jreznik, 12:10:17)
>
>  * Playground repository  (tjanez, 12:32:45)
>     * LINK: https://github.com/fedora-haskell/common/blob/master/common.mk
>       very low-tech :)  (juhp, 13:53:18)
>     * ACTION: hhorak will add an item to the playground open questions
>       about deleting the packages/builds already introduced in playground
>       and will send the summary of the irc discussion to the mailing list
>       to continue  (hhorak, 14:04:32) 
Added to open questions:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Playground_repository_%28dr...

And these are actually the comments from today's meeting worth keeping 
in mind:
* people install packages and later then we are not able to find the 
source for those packages
* disc space for copr builds is very limited
* rawhide deletes old builds as well but we can always find the source 
in dist-git (not possible in copr)
* keeping only srpms could be enough (for me personally it seems like 
the compromise)
* we're not sure if deleting packages in playground would violate GPL 
(legal list CC'd and the question could be -- "Is it violation of GPL if 
we offer RPMs and SRPMs at some point and delete them after some time?" 
-- now it seems like common scenario, happening every day, but rather 
asking to be sure)

Regards,
Honza

>     * We may follow the Workstation group's "Proposed System
> Wide Change:
>       Workstation: Enable Software Collections" and discuss it on the
>       devel list  (hhorak, 14:12:48)
>     * mirek-hm talked about "dnf playground enable" which would enable all
>       copr repos in playground  (hhorak, 14:15:59)
>     * We talked about scenario that playground would be implemented by
>       "copr with playground flag" + "dnf plugin working with such
> corps".
>       No voting done. No final decisions.  (hhorak, 14:19:57)
>
>  Meeting ended at 14:21:35 UTC.
>
>
>
>
>  Action Items
>  ------------
>  * hhorak will add an item to the playground open questions about
>     deleting the packages/builds already introduced in playground and will
>     send the summary of the irc discussion to the mailing list to continue
>
>
>
>
>  Action Items, by person
>  -----------------------
>  * hhorak
>     * hhorak will add an item to the playground open questions about
>       deleting the packages/builds already introduced in playground and
>       will send the summary of the irc discussion to the mailing list to
>       continue
>  * **UNASSIGNED**
>     * (none)
>
>
>
>
>  People Present (lines said)
>  ---------------------------
>  * juhp (122)
>  * mmaslano (66)
>  * hhorak (47)
>  * tjanez (43)
>  * mirek-hm (26)
>  * jreznik (13)
>  * drago01 (6)
>  * jwb (5)
>  * zodbot (4)
>  * Southern_Gentlem (4)
>  * pkovar (2)
>  * bkabrda (0)
>  * samkottler (0)
>  * abadger1999 (0)
>  * drieden (0)
>
>
>
>
>  Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
>
>  .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  env-and-stacks mailing list
>  env-and-stacks(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/env-and-stacks