[Fedora-legal-list] Re: License of jnlp-servlet.jar - part of Oracle JDK
Hi Dalibor,
[It seems the fedora legal list somehow dropped your response, so
keeping on CC.]
On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 10:31 +0200, dalibor topic wrote:
the issue has been marked as resolved.
Thanks. Apparently some legal issues do indeed take years to resolve :)
But nice to see the license text being clarified now.
After downloading 8u131 demos and samples from
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jdk8-downloads-21...
I took a quick look at some of files and they seemed fixed.
Yes I couldn't find the "nuclear facility" clause anywhere anymore in
http://download.oracle.com/otn-pub/java/jdk/8u131-b11-demos/d54c1d3a095b4...
And the "Oracle BSD License" now seems to simply be the standard BSD
license without any extra terms.
Do note that there are still files (all under sample/jnlp/ except for
the GNUmakefile) that refer to SUN in the disclaimer text (instead of
ORACLE or leaving the company name out). But I assume that is fine.
Thanks,
Mark
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 18.11.2013 18:55, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> On 11/13/13 5:39 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> On 11/13/13 10:37 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I added Dalibor from Oracle to the CC, who has been helpful cleaning up
>>> some license issues around java in the past.
>>
>> As Tom said [0], filing a bug in the bug tracker is the way to go. I'll
track down
>> the owner of the file, and let you know what the bug ID is once I've done
that.
>
> I filed an issue, it's available at
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028538 .
>
> cheers,
> dalibor topic
>