Dne 26. 06. 20 v 13:54 Igor Raits napsal(a):
On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 13:48 +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 13:33 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Looking for example at git-lfs:
>>
>>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/git-lfs/blob/master/f/git-lfs.spec
>>
>> I am afraid that the license field is wrong. Since the Go packages
>> are
>> statically linked, that means also content of all the BR is part of
>> the
>> binary packages and therefore should include their licenses. This
>> also
>> applies to Rust and all other statically linked packages.
> I think we already do it fine for Rust, no?
>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-ripgrep/blob/master/f/rust-ripgre...
>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-bat/blob/master/f/rust-bat.spec#_35
>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-starship/blob/master/f/rust-stars...
> and so on.
Forgot to mention that we even have script to generate those:
https://pagure.io/fedora-rust/rust2rpm/blob/master/f/tools/fedora-helper.py
Ah, nice. Thx for claficiation.
>>
>> I believe the guidelines should be amended to handle this scenario
>> and
>> all the packages fixed appropriately.
But this point still stands IMO.
V.
> We've also discussed this here:
>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rpick/pull-request/1
>>
>> Thoughts?
> I think Pull Request is very welcomed in the packaging guidelines.
>>
>> Vít
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> legal mailing list -- legal(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines:
>>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org