That's just BSD.

Thanks Tom, I do see in https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause

Note: This license has also been called the "Simplified BSD License" and the "FreeBSD License". See also the 3-clause BSD License.

but this causes us some problems...

The licenses are collected automatically and included in the package docs and there are instance like:

    <packageName>liquid</packageName>
    <version>0.1.0-1</version>
    <licenses>
      <license>
        <name>BSD-2-Clause</name>
        <url>https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause</url>

and other similar entries with this license abbreviation.

The License: label has a and with the 3 licenses listed, and just BSD will appear discrepant from what is included by the automatically generated licenses file.

As https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause got its own SPDX identifier "BSD-2-Clause" could we not add it too?

Cheers,

Fernando

~tom

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, 5:59 AM Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com> wrote:

Hi,


Would it be possible to add to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses

and corresponding databases the license:


BSD-2-Clause    https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause


Thanks!


P.S.: We currently have only  BSD-2-Clause-Patent 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/BSD-2-Clause-Patent

_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org