Hi,
After move mp3 related packages to Fedora proper, we still have twolame and kwave to move or to review .
I want focus on twolame [1] as state in [2] twolame is a MP2 (not MP3) encoder , is now eligible for a Fedora package or not ?
Thanks,
[1] http://twolame.org/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPEG-1_Audio_Layer_II
[2] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4754#c1
On 01/10/2018 01:35 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
After move mp3 related packages to Fedora proper, we still have twolame and kwave to move or to review .
I want focus on twolame [1] as state in [2] twolame is a MP2 (not MP3) encoder , is now eligible for a Fedora package or not ?
twolame is fine for Fedora.
~tom
On 2018-01-10 13:36, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 01/10/2018 01:35 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
After move mp3 related packages to Fedora proper, we still have twolame and kwave to move or to review .
I want focus on twolame [1] as state in [2] twolame is a MP2 (not MP3) encoder , is now eligible for a Fedora package or not ?
twolame is fine for Fedora.
Great news, Tom, thanks!
Sérgio, are you planning on proposing twolame yourself? Once it's in, then the following packages could also use it:
* audacity (make all %{?_with_mp3} unconditional) * gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel, remove --disable-twolame, update %files) * sox (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel)
All this should be coordinated with the external repository which has been supporting these.
Hi Yaakov,
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz yselkowi@redhat.com wrote:
On 2018-01-10 13:36, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 01/10/2018 01:35 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
After move mp3 related packages to Fedora proper, we still have twolame and kwave to move or to review .
I want focus on twolame [1] as state in [2] twolame is a MP2 (not MP3) encoder , is now eligible for a Fedora package or not ?
twolame is fine for Fedora.
Great news, Tom, thanks!
Sérgio, are you planning on proposing twolame yourself? Once it's in, then the following packages could also use it:
I am helping on twolame. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533719
- audacity (make all %{?_with_mp3} unconditional)
- gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel, remove
--disable-twolame, update %files)
- sox (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel)
All this should be coordinated with the external repository which has been supporting these.
-- Yaakov Selkowitz Software Engineer - Platform Enablement Group Red Hat, Inc.
On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 21:00 -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2018-01-10 13:36, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 01/10/2018 01:35 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
After move mp3 related packages to Fedora proper, we still have twolame and kwave to move or to review .
I want focus on twolame [1] as state in [2] twolame is a MP2 (not MP3) encoder , is now eligible for a Fedora package or not ?
twolame is fine for Fedora.
Great news, Tom, thanks!
Sérgio, are you planning on proposing twolame yourself? Once it's in, then the following packages could also use it:
- audacity (make all %{?_with_mp3} unconditional)
- gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel,
remove --disable-twolame, update %files)
- sox (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel)
All this should be coordinated with the external repository which has been supporting these.
Hello , if you add twolame in Fedora , you do me a big favor, I can help you in review if no one review package for you. I can coordinate the RPMFusion , but is not a big problem because we just bump on release version in rpm spec .
Anyway while I'm typing Zamir SUN made one package review !
Bye, best regards and thanks.
On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 21:00 -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2018-01-10 13:36, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 01/10/2018 01:35 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
After move mp3 related packages to Fedora proper, we still have twolame and kwave to move or to review .
I want focus on twolame [1] as state in [2] twolame is a MP2 (not MP3) encoder , is now eligible for a Fedora package or not ?
twolame is fine for Fedora.
Great news, Tom, thanks!
Sérgio, are you planning on proposing twolame yourself? Once it's in, then the following packages could also use it:
- audacity (make all %{?_with_mp3} unconditional)
- gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel,
remove --disable-twolame, update %files)
- sox (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel)
All this should be coordinated with the external repository which has been supporting these.
(sorry fixing some typos) Hello , if you add twolame to Fedora , you do me a big favor, I can help you in review if no one review package for you. I can coordinate the RPMFusion , but is not a big problem because we just need bump one version on release of rpm.
Anyway while I'm typing, Zamir SUN appears with one package review !
The links for coordination with RPMFusion are here [1] and [2] , you may drop a note there if I'm not tuned .
Bye, best regards and thanks.
[1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4459 [2] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4754
-
Sérgio Basto -
Tom Callaway -
Yaakov Selkowitz -
Zamir Sun