twolame could we move it to Fedora ?

[Sérgio Basto]

Hi, 

After move mp3 related packages to Fedora proper, we still have twolame
 and kwave to move or to review .

I want focus on twolame [1] as state in [2] twolame is a MP2 (not MP3)
encoder , is now eligible for a Fedora package  or not ? 

Thanks,

[1]
http://twolame.org/ 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPEG-1_Audio_Layer_II

[2]
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4754#c1

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

[Tom Callaway]

On 01/10/2018 01:35 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>  Hi, 
>  
>  After move mp3 related packages to Fedora proper, we still have twolame
>   and kwave to move or to review .
>  
>  I want focus on twolame [1] as state in [2] twolame is a MP2 (not MP3)
>  encoder , is now eligible for a Fedora package  or not ?  
twolame is fine for Fedora.

~tom

[Yaakov Selkowitz]

On 2018-01-10 13:36, Tom Callaway wrote:
>  On 01/10/2018 01:35 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > After move mp3 related packages to Fedora proper, we still have twolame
> >  and kwave to move or to review .
> >
> > I want focus on twolame [1] as state in [2] twolame is a MP2 (not MP3)
> > encoder , is now eligible for a Fedora package  or not ? 
>  
>  twolame is fine for Fedora. 
Great news, Tom, thanks!

Sérgio, are you planning on proposing twolame yourself?  Once it's in,
then the following packages could also use it:

* audacity (make all %{?_with_mp3} unconditional)
* gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel, remove
--disable-twolame, update %files)
* sox (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel)

All this should be coordinated with the external repository which has
been supporting these.

-- 
Yaakov Selkowitz
Software Engineer - Platform Enablement Group
Red Hat, Inc.

[Zamir Sun]

Hi Yaakov,

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  On 2018-01-10 13:36, Tom Callaway wrote:
> > On 01/10/2018 01:35 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >> After move mp3 related packages to Fedora proper, we still have twolame
> >>  and kwave to move or to review .
> >>
> >> I want focus on twolame [1] as state in [2] twolame is a MP2 (not MP3)
> >> encoder , is now eligible for a Fedora package  or not ?
> >
> > twolame is fine for Fedora.
>
>  Great news, Tom, thanks!
>
>  Sérgio, are you planning on proposing twolame yourself?  Once it's in,
>  then the following packages could also use it:
>  
I am helping on twolame.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533719

>  * audacity (make all %{?_with_mp3} unconditional)
>  * gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel, remove
>  --disable-twolame, update %files)
>  * sox (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel)
>
>  All this should be coordinated with the external repository which has
>  been supporting these.
>
>  --
>  Yaakov Selkowitz
>  Software Engineer - Platform Enablement Group
>  Red Hat, Inc.
>  
-- 
Ziqian SUN (Zamir)
zsun(a)fedoraproject.org
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
Want to know more about Fedora?
Visit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/

[Sérgio Basto]

On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 21:00 -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>  On 2018-01-10 13:36, Tom Callaway wrote:
>  > On 01/10/2018 01:35 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>  > > After move mp3 related packages to Fedora proper, we still have
>  > > twolame
>  > >  and kwave to move or to review .
>  > > 
>  > > I want focus on twolame [1] as state in [2] twolame is a MP2 (not
>  > > MP3)
>  > > encoder , is now eligible for a Fedora package  or not ? 
>  > 
>  > twolame is fine for Fedora.
>  
>  Great news, Tom, thanks!
>  
>  Sérgio, are you planning on proposing twolame yourself?  Once it's
>  in,
>  then the following packages could also use it:
>  
>  * audacity (make all %{?_with_mp3} unconditional)
>  * gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel,
>  remove
>  --disable-twolame, update %files)
>  * sox (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel)
>  
>  All this should be coordinated with the external repository which has
>  been supporting these. 
Hello , if you add twolame in Fedora , you do me a big favor, I can
help you in review if no one review package for you. 
I can coordinate the RPMFusion , but is not a big problem because we
just bump on release version in rpm spec .

Anyway while I'm typing Zamir SUN  made one package review ! 

Bye, best regards and thanks.
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

[Sérgio Basto]

On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 21:00 -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>  On 2018-01-10 13:36, Tom Callaway wrote:
>  > On 01/10/2018 01:35 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>  > > After move mp3 related packages to Fedora proper, we still have
>  > > twolame
>  > >  and kwave to move or to review .
>  > > 
>  > > I want focus on twolame [1] as state in [2] twolame is a MP2 (not
>  > > MP3)
>  > > encoder , is now eligible for a Fedora package  or not ? 
>  > 
>  > twolame is fine for Fedora.
>  
>  Great news, Tom, thanks!
>  
>  Sérgio, are you planning on proposing twolame yourself?  Once it's
>  in,
>  then the following packages could also use it:
>  
>  * audacity (make all %{?_with_mp3} unconditional)
>  * gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel,
>  remove
>  --disable-twolame, update %files)
>  * sox (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel)
>  
>  All this should be coordinated with the external repository which has
>  been supporting these. 
(sorry fixing some typos)
Hello , if you add twolame to Fedora , you do me a big favor, I can
help you in review if no one review package for you. 
I can coordinate the RPMFusion , but is not a big problem because we
just need bump one version on release of rpm.

Anyway while I'm typing, Zamir SUN appears with one package review ! 

The links for coordination with RPMFusion are here [1] and [2] , you
may drop a note there if I'm not tuned .

Bye, best regards and thanks.

[1]
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4459
[2]
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4754
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.