On 09/14/2015 05:17 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:45:32PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Paul W. Frields <stickster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 09:00:18PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
>>> I'm curious to know how *Red Hat* products
>>> could depend on EPEL packages though EPEL
>>> is *not* supported by Red Hat.
>> This is not a valid assumption from what the OP said. An installation
>> tool as he suggested could be independent of the product.
> May I ask what is the legal concern here? Is there a legal issue I'm missing?
> I just see EPEL policy questions really.
I don't see a clear legal question either, which I think is why
someone asked previously for some more details. I see a packaging
guidelines question as well as EPEL policy.
Correct. I assumed that such policy questions are settled on this list
as well, to large degree at least. Am I wrong?
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security