What would the proper license tag be for something that is licensed under GPLv1 (only)? I don't see such a thing on the license page. (this is for the cleanup project and the package is 'ncview'). I imagine that this would be just GPLv1, right?
Jon Stanley wrote:
What would the proper license tag be for something that is licensed under GPLv1 (only)? I don't see such a thing on the license page. (this is for the cleanup project and the package is 'ncview'). I imagine that this would be just GPLv1, right?
I think this is the first time we come across GPLv1 licensed software for Fedora but yes the logical choice is GPLv1 as the license tag.
Rahul
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
What would the proper license tag be for something that is licensed under GPLv1 (only)? I don't see such a thing on the license page. (this is for the cleanup project and the package is 'ncview'). I imagine that this would be just GPLv1, right?
I think this is the first time we come across GPLv1 licensed software for Fedora but yes the logical choice is GPLv1 as the license tag.
It seems so, but then, we currently use GPL+ for GPLv1 or later. So that's a bit strange. :/
Out of curiosity, what package is this?
Todd Zullinger wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
What would the proper license tag be for something that is licensed under GPLv1 (only)? I don't see such a thing on the license page. (this is for the cleanup project and the package is 'ncview'). I imagine that this would be just GPLv1, right?
I think this is the first time we come across GPLv1 licensed software for Fedora but yes the logical choice is GPLv1 as the license tag.
It seems so, but then, we currently use GPL+ for GPLv1 or later. So that's a bit strange. :/
Out of curiosity, what package is this?
ncview as mentioned in OP's mail.
Rahul
-
Jon Stanley -
Rahul Sundaram -
Todd Zullinger