Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 03:34 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>> On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 03:19 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> IIRC, I asked about this license precisely for the same software and
>>> is still being evaluated by FSF. So the status is unknown and
>>> as such.
>> I asked for a status update on this one.
> Thanks. Would marking such licenses as "Waiting on FSF" or something
> more specific make it better than "Unknown" ?
Well, they're not all waiting on FSF. Most of them are, but not all.
Precisely why I said "Waiting on FSF" or something more specific in more
useful than "Unknown". If it is waiting on someone else like Red Hat
Legal, mark it as such for more transparency. That would give people who
are looking for updates on the licensing page more information which is
always a good thing.