----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Brockmeier" jzb@redhat.com To: "Robyn Bergeron" rbergero@redhat.com, "Fedora Marketing team" marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: legal@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 11:01:01 AM Subject: Re: Copyright Submission Proposal
On 03/26/2014 12:55 PM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
#2: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 is listed in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing as a license that isn't acceptable for Fedora. I realize you're citing 4.0 here, and we don't have guidance on 4.0 in the wiki, but I have to imagine it's not going to be much of a change. The NC part is still NC... as you said, it's the most restrictive, and at least in my opinion, restrictiveness isn't exactly freedom-enabling :)
Yeah, my bad.
I have my reasons for preferring the NC, myself, but as I said - I'll go along with whatever the project/group prefer.
My main point is we should have one CC license content is published under, and authors should know and agree to that when they put stuff on the magazine.
As for the magazine being hooked up to FAS - have we been checking that all submissions come from people who've signed the FPCA? It's not automated.
I guess the question I'm asking (to be more clear): If I get access to publish something to the Magazine, how is that access granted? Am I added to a FAS group, which in turn provides permissions for access? Or is the addition to the magazine author/editor list done manually?
Best,
jzb
Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
-
Robyn Bergeron