Hi legal team,
I am trying to package finl_unicode [1][2], but we are having some issues with the ambiguous Copyright notice stating that it is licensed under Unicode license with "All rights reserved". The project uses generated source code and it is a bit unclear what license these belong to and what part of the code carries the Unicode license. We are trying to ask for clarification if some of the code is actually "Unicode-DFS-2016" licensed, and we are waiting for their reply.
So far we have made 2 PRs [3][4] that can side-step the obvious files that are under the Unicode license, but we need advice on whether those are sufficient or do we need to wait for more explicit confirmation form upstream?
[1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279514 [2]: https://github.com/dahosek/finl_unicode [3]: https://github.com/dahosek/finl_unicode/pull/17 [4]: https://github.com/dahosek/finl_unicode/pull/19
-
Cristian Le