Qt package licenses

[Jerry James]

This is a copy of a message sent to fedora-devel-list 1 week ago, so
far with no reply.

I'm doing a review of a MinGW build of a Qt 6 package:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009214

During the license check portion of the review, I have become
increasingly convinced that our qt5-* and qt6-* packages have
incorrect License fields.  Currently they have "LGPLv2 with exceptions
or GPLv3 with exceptions".  I believe that most or all of them should
have one of these two instead:

- LGPLv3 or GPLv2+
- LGPLv3 or GPLv2+ with exceptions

Would someone read through the comments on that bug and indicate
whether you think the analysis is correct or not, please?