Re: [Fedora-legal-list] ii package license

[Tristan Santore]

On 03/02/12 12:00, legal-request(a)lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Send legal mailing list submissions to
> 	legal(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	legal-request(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	legal-owner(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of legal digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. ii package license (Petr Šabata)
>    2. Re: ii package license (Josh Boyer)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:04:57 +0100
> From: Petr Šabata <contyk(a)redhat.com&gt;
> To: legal(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: [Fedora-legal-list] ii package license
> Message-ID: <20120203090457.GA27116(a)rincewind.brq.redhat.com&gt;
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Dear list,
> 
> I'm packaging the ii IRC client [1] for Fedora and the
> package reviewer has expressed concerns about its license.
> This software includes, in addition to the main MIT-licensed
> code, the following script:
> 
> http://hg.suckless.org/ii/file/d163c8917af7/query.sh
> 
> I've decided to use "MIT and Public domain" as the package
> license.  Would that be correct?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Petr
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784589 
>