repoze.sphinx.autointerface license

[Jerry James]

I'm packaging repoze.sphinx.autointerface and have a question about
the license.  It is almost the ZPLv2.1 license, but the text
identifying the license has been deleted, as has clause 4.  Do I still
call that ZPLv2.1 in the spec file, or is something else more
appropriate?  This is the text of the license file:

License

  A copyright notice accompanies this license document that identifies
  the copyright holders.

  Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
  modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
  met:

  1.  Redistributions in source code must retain the accompanying
      copyright notice, this list of conditions, and the following
      disclaimer.

  2.  Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the accompanying
      copyright notice, this list of conditions, and the following
      disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided
      with the distribution.

  3.  Names of the copyright holders must not be used to endorse or
      promote products derived from this software without prior
      written permission from the copyright holders.

  4.  If any files are modified, you must cause the modified files to
      carry prominent notices stating that you changed the files and
      the date of any change.

  Disclaimer

    THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS ``AS IS'' AND
    ANY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
    TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A
    PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
    HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,
    EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
    TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
    DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON
    ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR
    TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF
    THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
    SUCH DAMAGE.


Thank you,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/

[Tom Callaway]

On 05/29/2014 11:48 AM, Jerry James wrote:
>  I'm packaging repoze.sphinx.autointerface and have a question
> about
>  the license.  It is almost the ZPLv2.1 license, but the text
>  identifying the license has been deleted, as has clause 4.  Do I still
>  call that ZPLv2.1 in the spec file, or is something else more
>  appropriate?  This is the text of the license file: 
We call that license BSD:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:BSD?rd=Licensing/BSD#Modificatio...

~tom

==
¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º> OSAS @ Red Hat
University Outreach || Fedora Special Projects || Fedora Legal

[Jerry James]

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  We call that license BSD:
>
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:BSD?rd=Licensing/BSD#Modificatio...
Thanks, Tom!
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/