Question about Xen figlet artistic license & Fedora rules

[Daniel P. Berrange]

I've just noticed that the Xen source tre includes a copy of the figlet
source code. This appears to be licensed under the original non-clarified
artisitic 1.0 license which is on the forbidden list.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#head-d8cc605dd386091c8b6be97b8a43...

The differences between the original & clarified licenses are rather subtle
though, so I'd like someone to confirm.  I'm attaching the LICENSE file
that Xen includes in its source tree at  xen/tools/figlet/LICENSE 

If this is indeed the forbidden version I'll push this upstream to get Xen
to remove figlet.

Dan.
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

[Tom Callaway]

On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 21:01 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:

>  If this is indeed the forbidden version I'll push this upstream
> to get Xen
>  to remove figlet. 
This is indeed the original Artistic 1.0 license. You might try to get
the figlet copyright holder(s) to either dual license with something
else, or relicense to something else (perhaps Artistic 2.0).

~spot