I've just noticed that the Xen source tre includes a copy of the figlet source code. This appears to be licensed under the original non-clarified artisitic 1.0 license which is on the forbidden list.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#head-d8cc605dd386091c8b6be97b8a43fb6...
The differences between the original & clarified licenses are rather subtle though, so I'd like someone to confirm. I'm attaching the LICENSE file that Xen includes in its source tree at xen/tools/figlet/LICENSE
If this is indeed the forbidden version I'll push this upstream to get Xen to remove figlet.
Dan.
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 21:01 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
If this is indeed the forbidden version I'll push this upstream to get Xen to remove figlet.
This is indeed the original Artistic 1.0 license. You might try to get the figlet copyright holder(s) to either dual license with something else, or relicense to something else (perhaps Artistic 2.0).
~spot