On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:37:11 +0100 "Tom \"spot\" Callaway"
<tcallawa(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 03/01/2010 02:28 PM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
> Are they the same as "Consequential Damages"?
IANAL, but I'd say yes from what I'm seeing.
~spot
Ok, thanks Spot!