The license for TORQUE is under the OpenPBS license and isn't in the Fedora list of approved licenses, so I am sending it to you for review. The license text is attached.
Note that only points 3-6 must be met as the others have expired in 2001.
points 3 and 4 are met because none required notices have been removed.
point 5 is met by, at least, the Addendum at the bottom of the file.
Garrick Staples wrote:
The license for TORQUE is under the OpenPBS license and isn't in the Fedora list of approved licenses, so I am sending it to you for review. The license text is attached.
Note that only points 3-6 must be met as the others have expired in 2001.
points 3 and 4 are met because none required notices have been removed.
point 5 is met by, at least, the Addendum at the bottom of the file.
This license because of the expiry of clauses 1 and 2 looks close to the Original BSD license which is Free software although not GPL compatible. The one substantial differences seems to be the condition on clause 5 which insists on original and modified source code.
Rahul
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 05:17:17PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram alleged:
Garrick Staples wrote:
The license for TORQUE is under the OpenPBS license and isn't in the Fedora list of approved licenses, so I am sending it to you for review. The license text is attached.
Note that only points 3-6 must be met as the others have expired in 2001.
points 3 and 4 are met because none required notices have been removed.
point 5 is met by, at least, the Addendum at the bottom of the file.
This license because of the expiry of clauses 1 and 2 looks close to the Original BSD license which is Free software although not GPL compatible. The one substantial differences seems to be the condition on clause 5 which insists on original and modified source code.
Rahul
Thanks for looking over it. Does this mean it will be added to the list? And what do I put in the License: tag?
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 08:47 -0700, Garrick Staples wrote:
Thanks for looking over it. Does this mean it will be added to the list? And what do I put in the License: tag?
Once the FSF signs off on it, we'll add it to the list. I expect they'll get back to me today. I'll let you know when I hear back from them.
~spot
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 11:51:02AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway alleged:
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 08:47 -0700, Garrick Staples wrote:
Thanks for looking over it. Does this mean it will be added to the list? And what do I put in the License: tag?
Once the FSF signs off on it, we'll add it to the list. I expect they'll get back to me today. I'll let you know when I hear back from them.
I never saw an email responding on this issue.
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 11:04 -0700, Garrick Staples wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 11:51:02AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway alleged:
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 08:47 -0700, Garrick Staples wrote:
Thanks for looking over it. Does this mean it will be added to the list? And what do I put in the License: tag?
Once the FSF signs off on it, we'll add it to the list. I expect they'll get back to me today. I'll let you know when I hear back from them.
I never saw an email responding on this issue.
Haven't heard back from the FSF. They did tell me that they've received it, but they're backlogged at the moment, with no expected response date.
As soon as I hear, I'll let you know.
Sorry,
~spot
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 02:09:49PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway alleged:
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 11:04 -0700, Garrick Staples wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 11:51:02AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway alleged:
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 08:47 -0700, Garrick Staples wrote:
Thanks for looking over it. Does this mean it will be added to the list? And what do I put in the License: tag?
Once the FSF signs off on it, we'll add it to the list. I expect they'll get back to me today. I'll let you know when I hear back from them.
I never saw an email responding on this issue.
Haven't heard back from the FSF. They did tell me that they've received it, but they're backlogged at the moment, with no expected response date.
As soon as I hear, I'll let you know.
Ok, thanks.
No hurry on my end; I just wanted to check in.
The OpenPBS license is Free but GPL-Incompatible. I'm adding it to the table right now, the short name is "OpenPBS".
~spot
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 22:14 -0700, Garrick Staples wrote:
The license for TORQUE is under the OpenPBS license and isn't in the Fedora list of approved licenses, so I am sending it to you for review. The license text is attached.
Note that only points 3-6 must be met as the others have expired in 2001.
points 3 and 4 are met because none required notices have been removed.
point 5 is met by, at least, the Addendum at the bottom of the file.
I'm guessing that this is Free but GPL-Incompatible, due to the advertising clause and the "governed by the laws of the state of Virginia" wording.
I sent it to the FSF for confirmation.
~spot
-
Garrick Staples -
Rahul Sundaram -
Tom Callaway