License field on statically compiled executable

[Randy Barlow]

Greetings!

I recently opened a pull request against the rpick package to change
the license field to include all the licenses of all its components[0].
I did this because of this text from the licensing guidelines[1]:
> The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the
> binary rpm.

Since rpick is statically linked (it's a Rust program), it contains
contents of many libraries that have a variety of licenses.

Is it correct then to list all the licenses of the libraries in the
license field, as proposed in the pull request?

[0] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rpick/pull-request/1
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/Li...