lacp max active-linknumber link-number
lacp priority priority
Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:11:34AM CEST, batmanustc@gmail.com wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm using teamd-v1.31(tag v1.31) from source compile from
>https://github.com/jpirko/libteam .
>
>This is my network topo:
>```
>teamd-1
> | |
> veth11 veth01
> | |
> | |
> veth10 veth00
> | |
>teamd-0
>```
>Which is run team-1 with veth11 and veth01, run team-2 with veth10 and
>veth00.
>
>This is my conf:
>```
>### teamd-0
>
>[root@centos8-20240407 public-libteam]# cat ../lacp-t0.conf
>{
> "device": "team0",
> "runner": {
> "name": "lacp",
> "sys_prio": 5,
> "agg_select_policy": "lacp_prio",
> "active": true,
> "tx_hash": ["eth", "ipv4", "ipv6"]
> },
> "link_watch": {"name": "ethtool"},
> "ports": {
> "veth00": {"lacp_prio": 30},
> "veth10": {"lacp_prio": 20}
> }
>}
>
>### teamd-1
>
>[root@centos8-20240407 public-libteam]# cat ../lacp-t1.conf
>{
> "device": "team0",
> "runner": {
> "name": "lacp",
> "sys_prio": 66,
> "active": true,
> "tx_hash": ["eth", "ipv4", "ipv6"]
> },
> "link_watch": {"name": "ethtool"},
> "ports": {
> "veth01": {},
> "veth11": {}
> }
>}
>```
>
>In my opinion and code, I think this conf will cause this behavior:
>- teamd-0 use lacp, use low system priority, use equal port priority.
>- teamd-1 use lacp, use high system priority, use not euqal port priority.
>- then veth11 and veth10 will UP, veth01 and veth00 will DOWN.
>
>But in fact, veth11 and veth10 is UP, veth01 and veth00 is also UP.
What exactly do you mean by "UP" and "DOWN"?
>
>So:
>1) What's wrong with my configure?
>2) How to configure use lacp port priority?
>
>
>----
>Simon Jones
>--
>_______________________________________________
>libteam mailing list -- libteam@lists.fedorahosted.org
>To unsubscribe send an email to libteam-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org
>Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/libteam@lists.fedorahosted.org
>Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue