Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 07:16:36PM CEST, janos2010(a)farkas.ch wrote:
There was no patch needed for the integration on the libteam side.
I've
been testing the built package for several months now, but it's unlikely to
be accepted as a package from the git master branch.
The concern was that Void prefers an actual upstream release, with active
development, and a versioned tarball as a base point, and to avoid
requiring an internal maintainer. An ideal Void packaging is just a
template to integrity check an upstream tarball, a specification of
build//runtime dependencies for the given package, and preferably no
integration patches.
1.31 may have worked for the basic functionality, but for all I can see,
most of the commits merged into the master branch seem essential. At least
to avoid the daemon using 100% CPU seems critical enough.
Or perhaps I'm misunderstanding and you would accept a patch to bump the
version and publish 1.32 as a release?
Yes.
>
>Janos
>
>On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 5:45 PM Jiri Pirko <jiri(a)resnulli.us> wrote:
>
>> Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 08:11:55PM CEST, chexum+fedora(a)gmail.com wrote:
>> >Hi!
>> >
>> >I'm using the latest code from github, and I would also like to have it
>> packaged for a distribution which does not have libteam yet -
>>
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/33028
>>
>> Please send a patch. Pull requests are ignored. See file SubmittingPatches
>>
>> >
>> >They are making a point that it's preferable using a proper upstream
>> release. As far as I can see, the commits since 1.31 appear somewhat
>> important. On the other hand, even the latest github changes are somewhat
>> old, so I can't see anything unstable about it.
>> >
>> >For the benefit of a cleaner packaging, are there any plans to make a
>> numbered release anytime soon?
>> >
>> >Janos
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >libteam mailing list -- libteam(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>> >To unsubscribe send an email to libteam-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>> >Fedora Code of Conduct:
>>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> >List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> >List Archives:
>>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/libteam@lists.fedorahosted.org
>> >Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
>>
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>>