Hey,
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 16:18 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
* It's good to get into the habit of doing git commits for each
separate
change. Then you can get a patch per change. And that would avoid
having the addidir/addsdir stuff being in the same changes
FWIW, I don't think this approach useful, unless you're the type of
person that gets every change perfect first time :-)
Basically, git records a history of how you developed a set of changes,
rather than allowing you to work individual changes separately.
I've tried stgit (stacked git), but found it fairly cumbersome and
confusing. I may try it again sometime, but right now I still use quilt
for managing a set of patches ...
(And yes, quilt isn't perfect either - as demonstrated by me sending an
older version of a patch yesterday)
Cheers,
Mark.