Jeremy,
Here is a patch based on my conversation with Mark on supporting more
than 2 nameservers. I just changed it to effectively support an
unlimited number of nameservers. However I believe the linux network
stack may have a maximum it will use before failing a connection
attempt, I'm just not clear on what that number would be so went in
favor of infinite.
Either way, here is the patch file, hopefully generated correctly. It
would be great to see this in the next version so that we can return to
using the main build.
Mark, please let me know if there is an alternate place besides the list
that I should submit this. This will be my first time actually
submitting anything back to the community. :)
Thanks.
-Eli
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-livecd-list-bounces(a)redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-livecd-list-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Mark
McLoughlin
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 10:08 AM
To: fedora-livecd-list(a)redhat.com
Subject: RE: [Fedora-livecd-list] Problems with network setup on custom
livecd
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 09:56 -0400, Elias Hunt wrote:
Mark,
Thanks. I'll give splitting the network lines a try later today and
see if all goes well. I do have one more question. I glanced at the
patch you sent and it looks like it supports only two nameservers, a
primary and secondary. We actually need to put a total of four in
there. Can you just confirm if that behavior is true?
There's no real reason for us to not write out as many
nameservers as
is passed in, except that I think I was just following what anaconda
does.
Just send a patch, I'm sure Jeremy would take it.
Cheers,
Mark.
--
Fedora-livecd-list mailing list
Fedora-livecd-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list