On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 17:49 -0500, Douglas McClendon wrote:
I was thinking about what you said about "it makes anaconda
depend a bit
too much on the details". Can you clarify that a bit? Specifically, I
can imagine one or two possible (but not entirely pretty) ways to change
the patch, so that it makes 0 change to anaconda, at the expense of
adding a fair amount of complexity to liveinst.sh. But I'm not sure
what your long-term vision of liveinst.sh is. I.e. do you foresee it
getting folded into anaconda at some point?
For all intents and purposes, liveinst is part of anaconda. It just
does a tiny bit of setup and gives something that's useful to run. It
will probably continue to exist, mostly because it gives people
something nicer to tell people to run than saying "run anaconda with
this set of options". But putting complexity there isn't better or
worse really
Jeremy