Hi. I sent a patch to the list earlier, but it is trash now. The attached patch is much better, and I'm sure it can be improved though it kills off the None kernel version.
On 1/22/06, J. Hartline jasperhartline@adelphia.net wrote:
Hi. I sent a patch to the list earlier, but it is trash now. The attached patch is much better, and I'm sure it can be improved though it kills off the None kernel version.
Ive gone through your patch. It is only an " if - else " statement. I suggest that we integrate it to function.py instead of asking our users to patch function.py themselves. Let's simply their lifes :) Good job Jasper :)
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
Ive gone through your patch. It is only an " if - else " statement. I suggest that we integrate it to function.py instead of asking our users to patch function.py themselves. Let's simply their lifes :) Good job Jasper :)
Those patches are for use with rpmbuild. If a user patches a file themselves, that is thier business. I'm not even done with FC5t2 stuff anyways, I think we shouldn't be "asking" anyone to do anything with FC5t2 or any test release, what is on the development page says explicitly "For users interested" it doesn't say, "do this and get a RAWHIDE CD".
Please try not to take my posts out of context. ;-) J. Hartline
livecd@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Chitlesh GOORAH -
J. Hartline