12:43 a.m.
Hello,
I am following the list and wanted to try kadischi yesterday.
After creating the repo the installation went fine, it printed:
anaconda has finished the job
and now python is consuming 100% CPU, but I can't find any information
what it is doing.
Have I missed something important?
Regards,
Ingo
1:15 a.m.
Ingo Schaefer wrote:
Hello,
I am following the list and wanted to try kadischi yesterday.
After creating the repo the installation went fine, it printed:
anaconda has finished the job
and now python is consuming 100% CPU, but I can't find any information
what it is doing.
Have I missed something important?
Kadischi would be creating a compressed duplicate of the installation.
mkzisofs, mksquashfs, and mkisofs take a fair amount of time.
1:41 a.m.
Hello Jaspar,
Am Dienstag, den 11.04.2006, 01:15 -0500 schrieb Jasper O'neal Hartline:
Kadischi would be creating a compressed duplicate of the
installation.
mkzisofs, mksquashfs, and mkisofs take a fair amount of time.
Thanks for your fast reply.
Wouldn't all these processes make some traces in the system like
logfiles, temporary files and so on?
Or is anything done in memory? (This machine has 6G of it, with
currently 4,5 G used.)
Installation time from anaconda was 13 minutes, there are 2x3,2 GHz Xeon
processors in it and it does not do anything else now.
Top reports python with 100% cpu and 100 minutes cpu time being the
number one, idle percentage around 75 to 99
Of course I will wait, but I expected some progress indicator anywhere,
at least in disk usage or something like that.
Kind Regards,
Ingo
2:36 a.m.
Ingo Schaefer wrote:
Top reports python with 100% cpu and 100 minutes cpu time being the
number one, idle percentage around 75 to 99
Of course I will wait, but I expected some progress indicator anywhere,
at least in disk usage or something like that.
There is a possible loop determining the kernel version.
Can you say what kernel is or isn't being installed, and if there is
more than one?
Alot more information would be neccessary to come close to a plausible
explanation.
J. Hartline
2:56 a.m.
Hallo Jasper,
Am Dienstag, den 11.04.2006, 02:36 -0500 schrieb Jasper O'neal Hartline:
There is a possible loop determining the kernel version.
Can you say what kernel is or isn't being installed, and if there is
more than one?
Doing a rpm rpm --root=/tmp/livecd-build_no4/system/ -qa kernel gives
kernel-2.6.15-1.2054_FC5
This matches to the files in /tmp/livecd-build_no4/system/boot and
lib/modules there.
Alot more information would be neccessary to come close to a
plausible
explanation.
I will really try to give all information needed.
Thanks in Advance
Ingo
4:09 a.m.
Ingo Schaefer wrote:
Doing a rpm rpm --root=/tmp/livecd-build_no4/system/ -qa kernel gives
kernel-2.6.15-1.2054_FC5
This matches to the files in /tmp/livecd-build_no4/system/boot and
lib/modules there.
Sounds like you are getting a uniprocessor kernel installed, and
Kadischi detects
an SMP system.
J. Hartline
4:23 a.m.
Hello Jasper,
Am Dienstag, den 11.04.2006, 04:09 -0500 schrieb Jasper O'neal Hartline:
Sounds like you are getting a uniprocessor kernel installed, and
Kadischi detects
an SMP system.
You're right.
The live-cd I want to create should be run on Pentium IV machines with
HT initially. It would of course be nice to support other hardware, too.
So a generic i586 kernel will be okay in this case.
Any idea how I can fix this? Or helping you fixing it?
Regards,
Ingo
11:19 a.m.
Ingo Schaefer wrote:
You're right.
The live-cd I want to create should be run on Pentium IV machines with
HT initially. It would of course be nice to support other hardware, too.
So a generic i586 kernel will be okay in this case.
Any idea how I can fix this? Or helping you fixing it?
A Pentium 4 is capable of using the i686 kernels, HT also warrants the use
of an SMP kernel, in any case update your sources out of CVS and see if
the problem persists.
J. Hartline
2:14 a.m.
Hello,
Am Dienstag, den 11.04.2006, 11:19 -0500 schrieb Jasper O'neal Hartline:
in any case update your sources out of CVS and see if
the problem persists.
Thanks. Now I got another error but will create a seperate thread for
it.
In anaconda.log I found:
08:50:17 DEBUG : no kernel-smp package
08:50:17 INFO : selected kernel package for kernel
08:50:17 DEBUG : selecting kernel-devel
Thanks,
Ingo
6582
days inactive
6583
days old
livecd@lists.fedoraproject.org
8 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Ingo Schaefer -
J. Hartline