Re: [PATCH] Iperf: add option to use iperf3
Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 09:27:41AM CEST, roid(a)mellanox.com wrote:
iperf3 is based the original iperf and support similiar command line
and have a similiar output.
This commit allows to pass option to Iperf test module to use iperf3
binary instead of iperf and adds additional error catcher from iperf3.
In iperf probelmatic input is just ignore with a print.
Signed-off-by: Roi Dayan <roid(a)mellanox.com>
Hi, I think it's better to have this in separate Iperf3 module. Iperf
and iperf3 based on my experience are quite different and for
maintaining it would be much more simpler to keep it as a separate
module.
What do you think?
-Jan