Package builds for Zikula

[Eric Christensen]

I've been pushing my packages to devel, F-10, F-11, and EL-5.  Is
everyone else doing the same?

Eric

[Paul W. Frields]

On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Eric
Christensen<eric(a)christensenplace.us> wrote:
>  I've been pushing my packages to devel, F-10, F-11, and EL-5.
>  Is
>  everyone else doing the same? 
I've only been producing F-11 (devel is automatic).  I was under the
impression that the Infrastructure team was going to provide this
platform on a F-11 box, which is unusual but not unheard of AFAIK.

Paul

[Susan Lauber]

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Paul Frields<stickster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>  On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Eric
>  Christensen<eric(a)christensenplace.us> wrote:
> > I've been pushing my packages to devel, F-10, F-11, and EL-5.  Is
> > everyone else doing the same?
>
>  I've only been producing F-11 (devel is automatic).  I was under the
>  impression that the Infrastructure team was going to provide this
>  platform on a F-11 box, which is unusual but not unheard of AFAIK. 
> From IRC earlier today: 
<abadger1999> stickster_afk, Sparks: The underlying OS?  We'd prefer
RHEL5 if possible.
<abadger1999> We cando the latest Fedor release if we have to.

However, when I tried to install on RHEL5 from EPEL-testing I got
dependency errors about needing various php modules at >=5.2 and only
finding 5.1 versions available.

Here's my tedious details:
1. install virt instance of RHEL5.3, ensure web server and mysql
groups, register and yum update
2. add epel config (with rpm from wiki)

yum --enablerepo=*test* list zikula*

Loaded plugins: rhnplugin, security
Available Packages
zikula.noarch                              1.1.1-12.el5             epel-testing
zikula-module-MultiHook.noarch             5.0-4.el5                epel-testing
zikula-module-crpTag.noarch                0.1.3-3.el5              epel-testing

yum -y --enablerepo=*test* install zikula*

Loaded plugins: rhnplugin, security
Setting up Install Process
Parsing package install arguments
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package zikula.noarch 0:1.1.1-12.el5 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: php-mysql >= 5.2.0 for package: zikula
--> Processing Dependency: php >= 5.2.0 for package: zikula
--> Processing Dependency: php-pgsql >= 5.2.0 for package: zikula
---> Package zikula-module-MultiHook.noarch 0:5.0-4.el5 set to be updated
---> Package zikula-module-crpTag.noarch 0:0.1.3-3.el5 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
zikula-1.1.1-12.el5.noarch from epel-testing has depsolving problems
  --> Missing Dependency: php >= 5.2.0 is needed by package zikula-1.1.1-12.el5.
noarch (epel-testing)
zikula-1.1.1-12.el5.noarch from epel-testing has depsolving problems
  --> Missing Dependency: php-pgsql >= 5.2.0 is needed by package zikula-1.1.1-1
2.el5.noarch (epel-testing)
zikula-1.1.1-12.el5.noarch from epel-testing has depsolving problems
  --> Missing Dependency: php-mysql >= 5.2.0 is needed by package zikula-1.1.1-1
2.el5.noarch (epel-testing)

yum --enablerepo=*test* list php php-pgsql php-mysql

Loaded plugins: rhnplugin, security
Installed Packages
php.i386                      5.1.6-23.2.el5_3                installed
Available Packages
php-mysql.i386                5.1.6-23.2.el5_3                rhel-i386-server-5
php-pgsql.i386                5.1.6-23.2.el5_3                rhel-i386-server-5


-- 
Susan Lauber, (RHCX, RHCA, RHCSS)
Lauber System Solutions, Inc.
http://www.laubersolutions.com
gpg: 15AC F794 A3D9 64D1 D9CE  4C26 EFC3 11C2 BFA1 0974

[David Nalley]

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Susan Lauber<laubersm(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>  On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Paul
> Frields<stickster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Eric
> > Christensen<eric(a)christensenplace.us> wrote:
> >> I've been pushing my packages to devel, F-10, F-11, and EL-5.  Is
> >> everyone else doing the same?
> >
> > I've only been producing F-11 (devel is automatic).  I was under the
> > impression that the Infrastructure team was going to provide this
> > platform on a F-11 box, which is unusual but not unheard of AFAIK.
>
>  From IRC earlier today:
>
>  <abadger1999> stickster_afk, Sparks: The underlying OS?  We'd prefer
>  RHEL5 if possible.
>  <abadger1999> We cando the latest Fedor release if we have to.
>
>  However, when I tried to install on RHEL5 from EPEL-testing I got
>  dependency errors about needing various php modules at >=5.2 and only
>  finding 5.1 versions available.
>  
Apparently I did that, and I don't know why, as Zikula 1.x still
supports php4. Do you mind filing a bug against Zikula for this so I
don't forget about it, Susan?

[David Nalley]

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Paul Frields<stickster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>  On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Eric
>  Christensen<eric(a)christensenplace.us> wrote:
> > I've been pushing my packages to devel, F-10, F-11, and EL-5.  Is
> > everyone else doing the same?
>
>  I've only been producing F-11 (devel is automatic).  I was under the
>  impression that the Infrastructure team was going to provide this
>  platform on a F-11 box, which is unusual but not unheard of AFAIK.
>
>  Paul 
Conversations with infra have indicated EL-5 is their platform of choice.

[Jon Stanley]

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 7:03 PM, David Nalley<david(a)gnsa.us> wrote:

>  Conversations with infra have indicated EL-5 is their platform of
> choice. 
Yeah, if it's possible (which it sounds like it is).  I still need to
work with Eric on his EL-5 packages.

[Eric Christensen]

On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 19:48 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
>  On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 7:03 PM, David Nalley<david(a)gnsa.us>
> wrote:
>  
>  > Conversations with infra have indicated EL-5 is their platform of choice.
>  
>  Yeah, if it's possible (which it sounds like it is).  I still need to
>  work with Eric on his EL-5 packages. 
Jon,
I'm just getting back into town.  Tomorrow (Monday) doesn't seem to look
as awful as I was thinking it might.  Got some time?

Eric