With some help from quaid and ricky, I was able to get Zikula installed on pt15. It is a fresh install with a new database. This was to show what we need to do to make it ready.
The only thing that hit me was the fedora skins aren't packaged/available. What do we need to do for that?
--Eric
2009/8/8 Eric Christensen eric@christensenplace.us:
With some help from quaid and ricky, I was able to get Zikula installed on pt15. It is a fresh install with a new database. This was to show what we need to do to make it ready.
The only thing that hit me was the fedora skins aren't packaged/available. What do we need to do for that?
--Eric
logistics mailing list logistics@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/logistics
Yes they are, I think I passed SRPMs to Toshio already for inclusion in infra's repos
Here are the SRPMs http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-theme-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-fasauth-0.1-1.fc11.src.r...
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:34 PM, David Nalleydavid.nalley@fedoraproject.org wrote:
2009/8/8 Eric Christensen eric@christensenplace.us:
With some help from quaid and ricky, I was able to get Zikula installed on pt15. It is a fresh install with a new database. This was to show what we need to do to make it ready.
The only thing that hit me was the fedora skins aren't packaged/available. What do we need to do for that?
--Eric
logistics mailing list logistics@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/logistics
Yes they are, I think I passed SRPMs to Toshio already for inclusion in infra's repos
Here are the SRPMs http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-theme-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-fasauth-0.1-1.fc11.src.r...
The installation and upgrade scripts need to be moved away too. There are instructions listed on the "build your own snadbox" page which is linked from our Zikula page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zikula
Paul
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 14:34, David Nalleydavid.nalley@fedoraproject.org wrote:
2009/8/8 Eric Christensen eric@christensenplace.us:
With some help from quaid and ricky, I was able to get Zikula installed on pt15. It is a fresh install with a new database. This was to show what we need to do to make it ready.
The only thing that hit me was the fedora skins aren't packaged/available. What do we need to do for that?
--Eric
logistics mailing list logistics@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/logistics
Yes they are, I think I passed SRPMs to Toshio already for inclusion in infra's repos
Here are the SRPMs http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-theme-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-fasauth-0.1-1.fc11.src.r...
So these are in a repo already or are planning on being in a repo? I literally did a 'sudo yum install zikula*' and these weren't pulled down so if they are in a repo PT15 didn't know about it.
--Eric
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:05:58AM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 14:34, David Nalleydavid.nalley@fedoraproject.org wrote:
2009/8/8 Eric Christensen eric@christensenplace.us:
With some help from quaid and ricky, I was able to get Zikula installed on pt15. It is a fresh install with a new database. This was to show what we need to do to make it ready.
The only thing that hit me was the fedora skins aren't packaged/available. What do we need to do for that?
--Eric
logistics mailing list logistics@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/logistics
Yes they are, I think I passed SRPMs to Toshio already for inclusion in infra's repos
Here are the SRPMs http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-theme-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-fasauth-0.1-1.fc11.src.r...
So these are in a repo already or are planning on being in a repo? I literally did a 'sudo yum install zikula*' and these weren't pulled down so if they are in a repo PT15 didn't know about it.
To have these installable you need the following things, some of which may already be done:
* An EL-5 branch for each package * Request an EL-5 build in koji * Request the EL-5 package in bodhi as a "newpackage" push into testing * Wait two weeks in testing * Request the EL-5 package in bodhi to be pushed to stable
At the conclusion, it would be in the repositories and installable through EPEL. Someone mentioned that the publictest* machines have the EPEL-5 "updates-testing" repo turned on. If that's the case, then you'd be able to install after step 3 instead of step 5.
So check to see that the package has been pushed to at least testing at this point.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Paul W. Frieldsstickster@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:05:58AM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 14:34, David Nalleydavid.nalley@fedoraproject.org wrote:
2009/8/8 Eric Christensen eric@christensenplace.us:
With some help from quaid and ricky, I was able to get Zikula installed on pt15. It is a fresh install with a new database. This was to show what we need to do to make it ready.
The only thing that hit me was the fedora skins aren't packaged/available. What do we need to do for that?
--Eric
logistics mailing list logistics@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/logistics
Yes they are, I think I passed SRPMs to Toshio already for inclusion in infra's repos
Here are the SRPMs http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-theme-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-fasauth-0.1-1.fc11.src.r...
So these are in a repo already or are planning on being in a repo? I literally did a 'sudo yum install zikula*' and these weren't pulled down so if they are in a repo PT15 didn't know about it.
To have these installable you need the following things, some of which may already be done:
- An EL-5 branch for each package
- Request an EL-5 build in koji
- Request the EL-5 package in bodhi as a "newpackage" push into testing
- Wait two weeks in testing
- Request the EL-5 package in bodhi to be pushed to stable
At the conclusion, it would be in the repositories and installable through EPEL. Someone mentioned that the publictest* machines have the EPEL-5 "updates-testing" repo turned on. If that's the case, then you'd be able to install after step 3 instead of step 5.
So check to see that the package has been pushed to at least testing at this point.
-- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug _______________________________________________ logistics mailing list logistics@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/logistics
So these are fedora-specific zikula modules. FAS auth and the fedora-theme are not likely to be used elsewhere, so they should likely live only in infra's internal repository, not EPEL. Toshio may be able to shed more light on the process for getting packages into infra's repo, but I believe I have already submitted the packages to him for inclusion.
On 08/10/2009 07:34 AM, David Nalley wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Paul W. Frieldsstickster@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:05:58AM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 14:34, David
Yes they are, I think I passed SRPMs to Toshio already for inclusion in infra's repos
Here are the SRPMs http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-theme-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-fasauth-0.1-1.fc11.src.r...
So these are fedora-specific zikula modules. FAS auth and the fedora-theme are not likely to be used elsewhere, so they should likely live only in infra's internal repository, not EPEL. Toshio may be able to shed more light on the process for getting packages into infra's repo, but I believe I have already submitted the packages to him for inclusion.
Sorry, I forgot about this. I'm building them for the infrastructure repo right now.
Do we want fasauth to go into Fedora itself? Will people be testing zikula on their own machines? Would being able to easily install fasauth help them do so? I'm not sure precisely how we're developing our zikula installation so that might not be a concern here.
-Toshio
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 01:23:29PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 08/10/2009 07:34 AM, David Nalley wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Paul W. Frieldsstickster@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:05:58AM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 14:34, David
Yes they are, I think I passed SRPMs to Toshio already for inclusion in infra's repos
Here are the SRPMs http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-theme-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-fasauth-0.1-1.fc11.src.r...
So these are fedora-specific zikula modules. FAS auth and the fedora-theme are not likely to be used elsewhere, so they should likely live only in infra's internal repository, not EPEL. Toshio may be able to shed more light on the process for getting packages into infra's repo, but I believe I have already submitted the packages to him for inclusion.
Sorry, I forgot about this. I'm building them for the infrastructure repo right now.
Do we want fasauth to go into Fedora itself? Will people be testing zikula on their own machines? Would being able to easily install fasauth help them do so? I'm not sure precisely how we're developing our zikula installation so that might not be a concern here.
I *think* the answer is yes -- that we want people to be able to effectively sandbox a Zikula locally to develop workflows that they can then propose to a wider group.
On 08/12/2009 01:49 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 01:23:29PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Do we want fasauth to go into Fedora itself? Will people be testing zikula on their own machines? Would being able to easily install fasauth help them do so? I'm not sure precisely how we're developing our zikula installation so that might not be a concern here.
I *think* the answer is yes -- that we want people to be able to effectively sandbox a Zikula locally to develop workflows that they can then propose to a wider group.
Okay. So the rpms are in the infrastructure repo now but we'll want to put that one through the review process as well. Once it's in Fedora/EPEL we can remove it from the infra repo.
-Toshio
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009, Eric Christensen wrote:
With some help from quaid and ricky, I was able to get Zikula installed on pt15. It is a fresh install with a new database. This was to show what we need to do to make it ready.
The only thing that hit me was the fedora skins aren't packaged/available. What do we need to do for that?
Ricky, will you be point person regarding integration (installation in staging) here?
-Mike
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-08-09 03:59:36 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
Ricky, will you be point person regarding integration (installation in staging) here?
Sure, I'd be happy to help wherever I can here. Toshio has also keeping up with zikula efforts a lot, which is great :-)
probably best to let Toshio work on it then. For some reason I thought you'd already done some integration work with zikula in staging in the past... I probably dreamed it up.
-Mike
logistics@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
David Nalley -
David Nalley -
Eric Christensen -
Mike McGrath -
Paul W. Frields -
Ricky Zhou -
Toshio Kuratomi