February 2023 - Lua Packagers SIG - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 2152006] New: luarocks-3.9.2 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152006 Bug ID: 2152006 Summary: luarocks-3.9.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: luarocks Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com, lua-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 3.9.2 Upstream release that is considered latest: 3.9.2 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.9.1-1.fc38 URL: https://luarocks.org/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release... Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1856/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/luarocks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152006

1 week

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 2167829] New: [RFE: EPEL9] EPEL9 branch for luarocks

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2167829 Bug ID: 2167829 Summary: [RFE: EPEL9] EPEL9 branch for luarocks Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: luarocks Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name Reporter: riehecky(a)fnal.gov QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com, lua-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Can luarocks be branched for EPEL9? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2167829

2 weeks, 2 days

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 2073884] New: CVE-2022-28805 dev-lang/lua: heap buffer overread

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073884 Bug ID: 2073884 Summary: CVE-2022-28805 dev-lang/lua: heap buffer overread Product: Security Response Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: ahanwate(a)redhat.com CC: 4le(a)live.com, drjohnson1(a)gmail.com, lua-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mhroncok(a)redhat.com, michel(a)michel-slm.name, rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, spotrh(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Other singlevar in lparser.c in Lua through 5.4.4 lacks a certain luaK_exp2anyregup call, leading to a heap-based buffer over-read that might affect a system that compiles untrusted Lua code. https://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2022-02/msg00001.html https://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2022-02/msg00070.html https://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2022-04/msg00009.html https://github.com/lua/lua/commit/1f3c6f4534c6411313361697d98d1145a1f030fa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073884

3 weeks, 4 days

1
12
0 / 0

[Bug 2064772] New: CVE-2021-44964 lua: use after free allows Sandbox Escape

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064772 Bug ID: 2064772 Summary: CVE-2021-44964 lua: use after free allows Sandbox Escape Product: Security Response Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: pdelbell(a)redhat.com CC: 4le(a)live.com, caswilli(a)redhat.com, csutherl(a)redhat.com, drjohnson1(a)gmail.com, fedora(a)famillecollet.com, fjansen(a)redhat.com, gzaronik(a)redhat.com, hdegoede(a)redhat.com, jburrell(a)redhat.com, jclere(a)redhat.com, jwon(a)redhat.com, kaycoth(a)redhat.com, krathod(a)redhat.com, lua-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mhroncok(a)redhat.com, michel(a)michel-slm.name, moceap(a)hotmail.com, mschmidt(a)redhat.com, mturk(a)redhat.com, packaging-team-maint(a)redhat.com, pjindal(a)redhat.com, rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, spotrh(a)gmail.com, szappis(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Other Use after free in garbage collector and finalizer of lgc.c in Lua interpreter 5.4.0~5.4.3 allows attackers to perform Sandbox Escape via a crafted script file. References: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2021-44964 https://github.com/Lua-Project/lua-5.4.4-sandbox-escape-with-new-vulnerab... http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-44964 http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2021-12/msg00007.html http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2021-12/msg00015.html http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2021-12/msg00030.html http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2021-11/msg00186.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064772

3 weeks, 4 days

1
29
0 / 0

[Bug 2047672] New: CVE-2021-43519 lua: stack overflow in lua_resume of ldo.c allows a DoS via a crafted script file

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047672 Bug ID: 2047672 Summary: CVE-2021-43519 lua: stack overflow in lua_resume of ldo.c allows a DoS via a crafted script file Product: Security Response Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: mrehak(a)redhat.com CC: 4le(a)live.com, bdettelb(a)redhat.com, caswilli(a)redhat.com, csutherl(a)redhat.com, drjohnson1(a)gmail.com, fjansen(a)redhat.com, gzaronik(a)redhat.com, jburrell(a)redhat.com, jclere(a)redhat.com, jwon(a)redhat.com, kaycoth(a)redhat.com, krathod(a)redhat.com, lua-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mhroncok(a)redhat.com, michel(a)michel-slm.name, mturk(a)redhat.com, packaging-team-maint(a)redhat.com, pjindal(a)redhat.com, rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, spotrh(a)gmail.com, szappis(a)redhat.com, tkasparek(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Other Stack overflow in lua_resume of ldo.c in Lua Interpreter allows attackers to perform a Denial of Service via a crafted script file. Reference: http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2021-11/msg00015.html http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2021-10/msg00123.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047672

2 months, 3 weeks

1
17
0 / 0

[Bug 2169615] New: fennel-1.3.0 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169615 Bug ID: 2169615 Summary: fennel-1.3.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fennel Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, lua-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 0.4.3, 1.3.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.3.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.2.1-2.fc38 URL: https://fennel-lang.org/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release... Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/22691/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fennel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169615

3 months, 1 week

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 2143050] Review Request: lua-zlib - Simple streaming interface to zlib for Lua

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143050 --- Comment #4 from Jonny Heggheim <hegjon(a)gmail.com> --- Thanks, I updated the build to include the LDFLAGS. I did not notice the test.lua, the print(zlib.version()) was just a smoke test since I thought I did not have any unit tests to run. test.lua also includes the setup of cpath, so %check was updated to only: %check lua test.lua Uploaded updated spec+srpm, same URLs. Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=97679291 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143050

3 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2143050] Review Request: lua-zlib - Simple streaming interface to zlib for Lua

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143050 Petr Menšík <pemensik(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pemensik(a)redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Petr Menšík <pemensik(a)redhat.com> --- I think variables passed to build must include also LDFLAGS: CFLAGS="%{optflags} -fPIC" LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -shared -fPIC" And I think %check should also include unit test present in sources: %check export LUA_CPATH=%{buildroot}%{lua_libdir}/zlib.so lua -e 'local zlib = require "zlib"; print(zlib.version());' lua test.lua Otherwise it seems ready. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143050

3 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2165689] New: lua-posix-36.0 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165689 Bug ID: 2165689 Summary: lua-posix-36.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: lua-posix Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lua-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name, orion(a)nwra.com, redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 36.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 36.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 35.1-5.fc38 URL: https://github.com/luaposix/luaposixluaposix/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release... Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/11729/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lua-posix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165689

3 months, 3 weeks

1
4
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

Lua Packagers SIG February 2023