April 2023 - Lua Packagers SIG - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 2185584] New: lua-readline-3.3 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185584 Bug ID: 2185584 Summary: lua-readline-3.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: lua-readline Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lua-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name, redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 3.3 Upstream release that is considered latest: 3.3 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.2-2.fc38 URL: https://pjb.com.au/comp/lua/readline.html Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release... Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/141627/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lua-readline -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185584

3 months, 3 weeks

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 2192164] New: luarocks-3.9.1 installs to /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192164 Bug ID: 2192164 Summary: luarocks-3.9.1 installs to /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: luarocks Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name Reporter: ferdnyc(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com, lua-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I messed up. As I detail at the end of this Fedora Discussions thread[1], when I submitted the PR for the luarocks-3.9.1 update, I mistakenly dropped the Fedora patch that was correcting the default arch-specific library install dir to /usr/lib64 instead of /usr/lib. So, without that patch, luarocks installs to the wrong library directory. [1]: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/luarocks-does-not-install-into-lib... Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): luarocks-3.9.1-1.fc39 (luarocks on f38 and f37 is also affected; possibly EPEL as well) How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. `sudo luarocks --global install LuaFileSystem` 2. `ls /usr/lib64/lua/5.4/lfs.so` 3. `ls /usr/lib/lua/5.4/lfs.so` Actual results: 2: ls: cannot access '/usr/lib64/lua/5.4/lfs.so': No such file or directory 3: /usr/lib/lua/5.4/lfs.so Expected results: 2: /usr/lib64/lua/5.4/lfs.so 3: ls: cannot access '/usr/lib/lua/5.4/lfs.so': No such file or directory Additional info: I've already submitted a PR [2] to correct this on rawhide. I'll be happy to submit backport PRs for f38 and f37 as well, if need be. Any chance we could get new builds, to correct this unfortunate screw-up on my part? (I'll even add in an update to luarocks-3.9.2, since that's been released now, so we kill two birds with one bodhi update.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192164

4 months

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 2152006] New: luarocks-3.9.2 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152006 Bug ID: 2152006 Summary: luarocks-3.9.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: luarocks Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com, lua-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 3.9.2 Upstream release that is considered latest: 3.9.2 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.9.1-1.fc38 URL: https://luarocks.org/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release... Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1856/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/luarocks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152006

4 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 2167829] New: [RFE: EPEL9] EPEL9 branch for luarocks

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2167829 Bug ID: 2167829 Summary: [RFE: EPEL9] EPEL9 branch for luarocks Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: luarocks Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name Reporter: riehecky(a)fnal.gov QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com, lua-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Can luarocks be branched for EPEL9? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2167829

4 months, 1 week

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 2073884] New: CVE-2022-28805 dev-lang/lua: heap buffer overread

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073884 Bug ID: 2073884 Summary: CVE-2022-28805 dev-lang/lua: heap buffer overread Product: Security Response Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: ahanwate(a)redhat.com CC: 4le(a)live.com, drjohnson1(a)gmail.com, lua-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mhroncok(a)redhat.com, michel(a)michel-slm.name, rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, spotrh(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Other singlevar in lparser.c in Lua through 5.4.4 lacks a certain luaK_exp2anyregup call, leading to a heap-based buffer over-read that might affect a system that compiles untrusted Lua code. https://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2022-02/msg00001.html https://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2022-02/msg00070.html https://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2022-04/msg00009.html https://github.com/lua/lua/commit/1f3c6f4534c6411313361697d98d1145a1f030fa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073884

4 months, 2 weeks

1
12
0 / 0

[Bug 2064772] New: CVE-2021-44964 lua: use after free allows Sandbox Escape

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064772 Bug ID: 2064772 Summary: CVE-2021-44964 lua: use after free allows Sandbox Escape Product: Security Response Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: pdelbell(a)redhat.com CC: 4le(a)live.com, caswilli(a)redhat.com, csutherl(a)redhat.com, drjohnson1(a)gmail.com, fedora(a)famillecollet.com, fjansen(a)redhat.com, gzaronik(a)redhat.com, hdegoede(a)redhat.com, jburrell(a)redhat.com, jclere(a)redhat.com, jwon(a)redhat.com, kaycoth(a)redhat.com, krathod(a)redhat.com, lua-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mhroncok(a)redhat.com, michel(a)michel-slm.name, moceap(a)hotmail.com, mschmidt(a)redhat.com, mturk(a)redhat.com, packaging-team-maint(a)redhat.com, pjindal(a)redhat.com, rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, spotrh(a)gmail.com, szappis(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Other Use after free in garbage collector and finalizer of lgc.c in Lua interpreter 5.4.0~5.4.3 allows attackers to perform Sandbox Escape via a crafted script file. References: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2021-44964 https://github.com/Lua-Project/lua-5.4.4-sandbox-escape-with-new-vulnerab... http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-44964 http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2021-12/msg00007.html http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2021-12/msg00015.html http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2021-12/msg00030.html http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2021-11/msg00186.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064772

4 months, 2 weeks

1
29
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

Lua Packagers SIG April 2023